That’s why we decided to fill in the gap and give our clients a whole portfolio solution that enables them to manage both public and private asset classes simultaneously, and to quantify the common factors among client portfolio exposures, project cashflows, and unify the risk metrics for both public and private markets—all while tackling the greatest challenge of our generation.
But it’s also about the sheer amount of data—the volume—that makes measurement a challenge.
As private markets have developed and grown in size, so too has the appetite for information—across the board. Both asset owners and asset managers are looking for actionable information that can often be hidden in unstructured data or require major time commitments to parse through—like financial documents. This can undermine the efficiency and scalability of these operations and creates the demand for solutions that automate the information extraction process.
And it’s not just about the volume of data, but asset class coverage, increased investor demand, and financing the transition. I could add regulation to the list, but let’s just call it “mutually agreed standards” for today. As you may have heard, reporting standards are inconsistent. And as corporate disclosures become more practiced, when it comes to sustainability in particular, the volume of data will increase vastly. For investors to get a complete picture of their portfolios—estimating that data and making it transparent will be key.
Meanwhile, the complexity of even tracking the well-represented investments—structured products, real estate, private credit, and infrastructure—will become more of a challenge—especially from an ESG lens. Compounding this: investor demand for companies to demonstrate their transition or contributions to a net-zero economy.
As Larry Fink said in his annual letter to shareholders, with additional focus and scrutiny on carbon-intensive assets in the public markets, there is a risk of companies divesting so-called “dirty” assets to the private sector.
This only exacerbates the need to understand what you own and foster a set of standards in the private markets for companies to report on, and for asset owners and asset managers to hold them accountable. What can be measured can be managed. Already, the SFDR and TCFD rules, particularly in Europe, are helping to codify how participants measure their impact, and communicate that impact back to investors.
Nordic investors have historically been at the forefront of sustainability, and you know that you need to be serious about data if you want to be serious about sustainability. All of this ties in together: again, climate risk is investment risk, and the only way that we can measure and manage that risk is through high-quality data. In 2020, we launched Aladdin Climate to help clients understand risks how the physical toll of climate change and how the transition to a low-carbon economy impacts risk and returns, across portfolios.
And in the Nordics and beyond, the demand from LPs for quantifiable ESG data is increasing quickly. But the challenge now is that there are a lot of GPs that are not reporting ESG information to LPs—and when it is reported, it is very inconsistent. In addition, because there are so many different ESG reporting frameworks in place globally, it becomes very cumbersome for LPs—even if they get the data—to make sense of it.
The lack of unified metrics, combined with low adoption, prevents the creation of a benchmark that allows either GPs or LPs to assess whether an ESG number is necessarily good or bad. So, we also need technology to help deliver benchmarks and also help establish a standard of relativity for improvement or decline.
Technology is vital, when it comes to measuring and managing risk in private markets—whether it’s across specific portfolio goals (like ESG) or to bring balance to investment strategies at a time where there is less liquidity and more volatility—like the era we are in currently.